Preventing extinction of southern resident killer whales, one whale at a time

Last month, our co-founder and Chief Scientist, Dr. Rob Williams, presented preliminary findings to Washington state’s Puget Sound Partnership Science Panel on our efforts to update what we know about the threats (lack of salmon, ocean noise, and toxic pollution) to southern resident killer whale (SRKW) recovery, to put those threats in the same mathematical currency, and to run different scenarios to see what it would take to prevent the extinction of this iconic population. Sadly, the answer was disheartening and underscored the seriousness of this issue.

When we led a similar effort in 2017, we concluded we could save SRKWs from extinction if we could all work together to get the orcas 30% more salmon. Back then, that seemed unattainable, but our scientific models showed we could recover SRKWs if we increased the number of Chinook salmon in the sea by 15% while doubling the whales’ hunting success by reducing noise from boats and ships. We knew in 2017 that our model relied on science that was already a few years out of date. Since 2017, the whales have been declining faster than our models predicted. We set out to find out why and what we could do about it.

 © Center for Whale Research

Forecasting what it will take to prevent extinction

In 2021, many of you gave generously to help us work with Drs Ben Nelson and Eric Ward to update the part of our model that tells us how SRKW birth and death rates change in good and bad salmon years. With support from Puget Sound Partnership (PSP), we integrated those relationships in a new cumulative effects model and ran management scenarios to see what it would take to reverse the decline. With PSP funding, we expanded our models to include more and better information on contaminants, disease, parasites, inbreeding, and the occasional case of direct, human-caused mortality from vessel strike, etc.

We also turned our direction from hindcasting what got the whales in this mess over the last 40 years, to forecasting what it will take to allow these whales to persist in a warming climate. We found that even our most optimistic salmon recovery targets from 2017 will not be enough to prevent the extinction of this iconic population. We need to slow the decline, buy some more time, and try to prevent sick whales from dying. And it looks as though we have one killer whale generation—28 years—to turn things around before the population tips over into an accelerating decline toward extinction. Inbreeding and climate change make this difficult task even more vexing.

Collectively, we’ve made progress on the noise front. Ship slow-downs by Ports of Vancouver, Seattle, and Tacoma are resulting in less ship noise, and our work is proving that the whales are feeding more when we make less noise in the Salish Sea. Keeping smaller boats farther from whales, and fully protecting foraging hotspots, is helping. In our own organization, we have scaled up the use of innovative, non-lethal deterrents to reduce seal predation on salmon at human-built bottlenecks, such as dams, fish ladders, and the Hood Canal Bridge. All of these efforts are helping but they are not enough to turn the population’s decline into recovery.

SRKW behavioral health metrics program

This year, inspired by our new understanding of the challenge we face saving SRKWs, we started a new SRKW behavioral health metrics program in partnership with Dr. Joe Gaydos, scientist director at the SeaDoc Society.

Dr. Rob Williams, left, with Dr. Joe Gaydos using a hydrophone to listen to underwater sound in Haro Strait. © Steve Ringman, The Seattle Times

If you were short of breath, or feeling sluggish, you’d probably decide to go see a doctor. Your doctor would measure your breathing and heart rate and compare these to normal values. Similarly, in whales, abnormal behavior can be a powerful early warning that a whale is in trouble. 

Fortunately, we have longitudinal data on breathing rates and swimming speeds of individual whales of known age and sex going back to 2003. We collect the data from land-based viewing sites using a surveyor’s theodolite as a completely noninvasive way to measure impacts of vessels on SRKW behavior, including foraging. We’ve reused the data to map foraging hotspots, and we are showing how the distribution of those foraging hotspots changes between good and bad salmon years. We’ve even used the data for noninvasive physiology studies that showed that a mother orca needs 42% more calories when she has a calf swimming beside her to keep up with the group.

Now, we are reexamining those meticulous data records and are finding hints that “whales of concern”, (meaning whales that have poor body condition and may not survive the season) tend to take shorter breaths and feed less often than healthy whales of the same age and sex. We believe the whales’ behavior can tell us when they are sick, long before they show up skinny or with that characteristic sign of fat loss behind the head (peanut-head) that indicates that a whale is near death. If we can detect warning signs sooner, then we can get wildlife veterinarians like Joe Gaydos out on the water to test whether an individual has a treatable infection, or would benefit from treatment for parasites.

Southern residents in their Salish Sea home. © Lindsey Stadler

Southern residents need our help now more than ever

There is a perception that the SRKW population has always been small, and it fluctuates between 70 and 100 individuals. What this last year of working with top experts in genetics, population dynamics, wildlife health, and ecotoxicology has taught us, is that the whales are telling us something. There is a pattern here. We are not seeing random fluctuations in a small population. We are seeing a population declining by 1% per year, on average. Due to lack of mature females and inbreeding, that decline will accelerate toward extinction if we don’t mitigate threats now. We need all hands on deck to keep whales from getting sick, and sick whales from dying. And we need your help.

Conservation is a crisis discipline. Agencies tend to react to crises after they’ve become too obvious to ignore. If we’re going to prevent the extinction of our beloved southern resident killer whales, we need to look forward, not back. Frankly, that innovation comes from the conservation science sector, not the management sector, and it is fueled by individual philanthropists like you, not government grants. 

The southern residents need your help now. As Oceans Initiative urgently scales up our work on the relationships between killer whale behavior, health, and population growth, we hope our community will turn their dedication into action. Can we count on your support today to help fund our continued research and the development of our SRKW behavioral health metrics program?

How much noise is too much for Southern resident killer whales?

Ship noise now dominates the soundscape of the world’s oceans, and the Salish Sea is no exception. Ocean noise can mask signals that fish, marine mammals, and even invertebrates use to communicate, navigate, find mates, and search for food. There has been so much amazing work done by many scientists and researchers to measure noise in the Salish Sea and to understand the impact of that noise on Southern resident killer whales (SRKWs). But how much noise is too much? How much mitigation is enough? And how will we know?

We are pleased to share this paper written by Oceans Initiative’s Chief Scientist Dr. Rob Williams along with Dr. Cindy Elliser and Ginny Broadhurst from the Salish Sea Institute, Western Washington University. This paper focuses on the critical question: How much is too much noise for Southern resident killer whales?

The Salish Sea Institute is publishing a series of white papers intended to stimulate discussion around urgent questions and transboundary cooperation of our shared Salish Sea. Together, Oceans Initiative and Salish Sea Institute hope to convince funders and managers of the urgent need for a carrying capacity study to try to estimate how much vessel noise is acceptable to SRKWs, and how much mitigation it will take to help the whales recover. If we don’t have a shared vision of our target destination for sound seas, we’ll never get there.

Building Resilience of Wildlife Populations

By Dr. Rob Williams, Chief Scientist

Have you ever read the fine print on your retirement plan? There’s probably a footnote somewhere to warn you that past performance of mutual funds or stocks do not guarantee similar results in the future. Investing in biodiversity conservation needs a similar caveat.

Sometimes, protecting endangered species comes down to common sense. When we stopped killing whales—after the 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling—many populations of large baleen whales recovered quickly. Many populations of humpback or grey whales, for example, have been growing at 5-10% each year for decades. Some have done so well that they have been taken off endangered species lists in countries around the world.

But, there are exceptions to the rule. Hundreds of thousands of dolphins were killed accidentally in seine nets in tuna fisheries in the eastern tropical Pacific until public pressure forced industry to adopt dolphin-safe fishing practices. After the initial problem was solved, spotted and spinner dolphin populations have barely recovered.

The southern resident killer whale population was depleted by about 30% during live-capture fisheries for display in aquaria. Even though the live-captures stopped in 1977, the population has not recovered to historic levels. On the contrary, the population has declined from 98 to 73 individuals over the last two decades.

Our newest research on beluga in the St Lawrence Estuary showed that, even though beluga hunting stopped in the 1970s, the population is unlikely to recover to pre-exploitation levels in our lifetime, because the threats of contaminants, inadequate prey, noise, and climate change work together to hinder recovery.

What do these populations teach us? Complacency leads to extinction. Decimating whale and dolphin populations is easier than recovering them. We see this in our own health. You can fall out of a tree and break your arm in an instant, but healing takes time. With whales, we cannot count on populations bouncing back from harm. Each population is unique. Some may need us to slow ships down to make less noise. Others may need us to reroute ships to avoid striking and killing coastal whales. Others may need us to invest in ropeless gear for lobster and crab traps. Each action, on its own, seems trivial. But collectively, we can build the natural resilience of the population to buffer the next threat—climate change.

In 2022, we need your help to build our organization’s resilience, as we build resilience of wildlife populations in the Pacific Northwest and beyond. As the effects of climate change become too obvious to ignore, there has never been a more urgent time to invest in our efforts to keep important ocean habitats clean, quiet, and full of life. Thank you for supporting our conservation mission.

Destroying and Restoring Critical Habitats of Endangered Killer Whales

Endangered species legislation in the U.S. and Canada aims to prevent extinction of species, in part by designating and protecting critical habitats essential to ensure survival and recovery. These strict laws prohibit adverse modification or destruction of critical habitat. The population dynamics of SRKWs are now driven largely by the cumulative effects of prey limitation, anthropogenic noise and disturbance, and toxic contaminants, which are all forms of habitat degradation.

It is difficult to define a single threshold beyond which permissible habitat degradation becomes unlawful destruction. In a recent paper in BioScience, with lawyers, scientists, and policy experts from Natural Resources Defense Council, Ecojustice, and the US Marine Mammal Commission, we present evidence suggesting that line may have already been crossed.

A message from our Chief Scientist

By Dr. Rob Williams

Like the whales we study, the Oceans Initiative team is highly mobile and migratory. We divide our time between getting our feet wet in the field, wherever our work is needed, and using our science to inform smart decisions to conserve wildlife. Covid-19 required us to hit pause on most of our travel plans this year, but it was a bit of a treat. We slowed down, and tried to improve our local conservation impact. With all of the time we saved on travel, we took the time to look inward to think strategically about the kind of work we want to do in the coming years, when a vaccine is in widespread use.

We are proud of the real-world impact our conservation science has, but some of it can feel pretty abstract at times. After all, you can’t see noise in the ocean. It will take years before the orcas we study start to show us—through increased births and longer lifespans—that our efforts to protect the whales’ habitats are paying off. So it was a real joy this year to work on projects that use carefully engineered sound signals to scare seals away from eating endangered salmon. We could see the conservation benefit of our work in real life, in real time. Five years from now, we hope that the offspring of some of the Chinook salmon we helped make it to their spawning grounds return as prey for endangered orcas.

Of course, time is the constraint here. As we work to get the whales more salmon, and quiet enough conditions to hunt, climate change is making our job harder every year. In 2021, we are strengthening our work to climate-proof recovery of belugas, dolphins, killer whales, and marine predators around the world. Our work is showing that we can save species by removing as many stressors as we can now, in order to build their resilience to buffer effects of climate change.

At Oceans Initiative, one of our core values is Optimism. We actively cultivate hope, focus on solutions, and acknowledge conservation successes. I am proud of our scientific accomplishments and our team’s optimism that carried us through 2020. With your support, I am hopeful that we can celebrate even more conservation wins in 2021 and beyond. Thank you for supporting our efforts to keep our oceans clean, quiet, and full of life.